Introduction to the Witchcraft Compiler Collection
Jonathan Brossard
5th of August |
DEFCON 24, Las Vegas, |
2016 |
USA |
TL ; DR
•The Witchcraft Compiler Collection is free software (MIT/BSD License).
•I would love you to extend it and contribute to WCC on https://github.com/endrazine/wcc
•You can write in Lua,
•No assembly skills required.
Who am I ?
Image courtesy of Pixabay
+ Nullcon Goa, which is awesome :)
+add your own preferred conferences around the globe here :) #NonExhaustiveList
DISCLAIMER S
DISCLAIMER
•My employers are not associated with this talk in any way.
•This is my personal research.
LEGAL HELP
•This talk received help from the EFF.
•Warmest thank you to Nate Cardozo, Andrew Crocker and Mitch Stoltz
Free legal advising to security researchers :
https://www.ef.org/ https://www.ef.org/issues/coders/reverse-
WE’RE RECRUITING
Fcrnx gb bhe fravbe frphevgl UE:
Wnzrf Fnyr
uggc://jjj.yvaxrqva.pbz/va/wnzrftfnyr
Tbbq yhpx !
AGENDA
•Motivation
•WCC components
•“Libifying” a binary
•Unlinking binaries
•Crossing a Fish and a Rabbit
•Introduction to Witchcraft
•Binary “refection” without a VM
•Towards binary self awareness
•Future work
MOTIVATION
Prerequisites: A binary you have the right to reverse engineer. No source code.
Case studies:
1)You would like to verify the results of a static analysis
2)You know a way to crash an application but don’t want to work on the entire binary (eg: remote fuzzing).
Let’s work on the ELF 64b version of
CASE STUDY : STATIC
ANALYSIS
STATIC ANALYSIS
STATIC ANALYSIS
STATIC ANALYSIS
STATIC ANALYSIS
STATIC ANALYSIS
We have only a partial symbolic stack trace. How to verify if this vulnerability exists ?
Wouldn’t it be nice if we could call reply_close() with arbitrary arguments directly ?
CASE STUDY : FUZZING
You are fuzzing a complex server (smbd) over the network.
CASE STUDY : FUZZING
We have only a partial symbolic stack trace.
This could be a worker thread (note: smbd is linked with libpthread).
I don’t want to resend new packets or restart threads when analyzing !
Bonus points if you triggered it via instrumentation/concolic execution and don’t actually have a trigger either.
Can we verify if this vulnerability is exploitable ?
Wouldn’t it be nice to call
rpc_clnt_record_build_header() or any function in client.so with arbitrary arguments directly ?
PROBLEM STATEMENT
You can do the later with some work (exported functions from shared libraries) but in theory, not the former ever ever (function directly within a binary).
Let’s make both possible with 0 code nor reverse
engineering.
WCC COMPONENTS
Binaries (C):
wld : witchcraft linker
wcc : witchcraft core compiler
wsh : witchcraft shell : dynamic interpreter + scripting engine
Scripts (lua, …):
wcch : witchcraft header generator
wldd : witchcraft compiler fags generator
...
Host machine : GNU/Linux x86_64 (mostly portable to POSIX systems).
WLD : “LIBIFICATION”
Transforming an ELF executable binary into an ELF shared library.
DEMOS
A word on decompiling
LIBIFICATION
typedef struct
{
unsigned char e_ident[EI_NIDENT]; /* Magic number and other info */
Elf64_Half e_type; |
/* Object fle type */ |
Elf64_Half e_machine; |
/* Architecture */ |
Elf64_Word e_version; |
/* Object fle version */ |
Elf64_Addr e_entry; |
/* Entry point virtual address */ |
Elf64_Of e_phof; |
/* Program header table fle ofset */ |
Elf64_Of e_shof; |
/* Section header table fle ofset */ |
Elf64_Word e_fags; |
/* |
Elf64_Half e_ehsize; |
/* ELF header size in bytes */ |
Elf64_Half e_phentsize; |
/* Program header table entry size */ |
Elf64_Half e_phnum; |
/* Program header table entry count */ |
Elf64_Half e_shentsize; |
/* Section header table entry size */ |
Elf64_Half e_shnum; |
/* Section header table entry count */ |
Elf64_Half e_shstrndx; |
/* Section header string table index */ |
} Elf64_Ehdr; |
|
DEMOS
Libifcation of proftpd
LIBIFICATION OF PROFTPD
WE REALLY PATCHED 1 BYTE
ONLY
USING OUR NEW SHARED
LIBRARY
HOW COMES THIS WORKS ?
We’re really creating a “non relocatable” shared library.
ET_DYN and ET_EXEC ELF fles are both executable (ASLR support in the kernel)
This is equivalent to creating a shared library with a non NULL base address (equivalent to prelinking)
Note: Amazingly, this shared library is still a valid executable too.
DEMOS
Linking against apache2
APACHE2 AS A SHARED
LIBRARY
APACHE2 AS A SHARED
LIBRARY
WCC : “UNLINKING”
The typical approach to reverse engineering is to transform binaries or shared libraries back to source code.
Instead, we aim at transforming fnal binaries or shared libraries back to ELF relocatable objects, that can later be relinked normally (using gcc/ld) into executables or shared objects.
This binary refactoring is enough to “reuse” (steal) binary functions without any disassembly. This is no longuer true : some relocations require some disassembly. We used the capstone disassembly library to perform this.
WCC : “UNLINKING”
Source code
Compiler
Relocatable
objects
(*.o)
L i n k e r
Binaries
(executables, shared libs…)
WCC : “UNLINKING”
Source code
Compiler
Decompiler
Relocatable
objects
(*.o)
L i n k e r
Binaries
(executables, shared libs…)
WCC : “UNLINKING”
Source code
Compiler
Decompiler
Relocatable
objects
(*.o)
L i n k e r
Binaries
(executables, shared libs…)
UNLINKING
Source code
Compiler
Decompiler
Relocatable |
|
objects |
|
(*.o) |
|
L |
w |
i |
|
n |
c |
k |
|
e |
c |
r |
Binaries
(executables, shared libs…)
WCC : COMMAND LINE
The command line is made to resemble the syntax of gcc :
WCC : INTERNALS
The front end is build around libbfd. The backend is trivial C to copy each mapped section of the binary, handle symbols and relocations.
Beneft of using libbfd : the input binary doesn’t need to be an ELF !
=> We can for instance transform a Win64 executable into ELF 64b relocatable objects…
DEMO
(Binary to object fle to relocatable
to unstripped library)
WCC : DEMO
DEMO
(Crossing a Fish and a Rabbit)
PE + ELF = PELF
WCC : PE32 TO ELF64
DEMO
Native OpenBSD on linux
WITCHCRAFT
Lua Interpreter
+
“Refected” C
API
=
INTRODUCTION TO
WITCHCRAFT
BINARY “REFLECTION”
WITHOUT A VM
Now that we know how to transform arbitrary binaries into shared libraries, we can load them into our address space via dlopen().
Let’s implement the same features as traditional virtual machines, but for raw binaries !
Whish list :
-Load arbitrary applications into memory
-Execute arbitrary functions with any arguments (and get results)
-Monitor/Trace execution
-Automated functions prototyping/annotation
-Learn new behavior
-Examine/Modify arbitrary memory
WSH : ARCHITECTURE
Loading is done via dlopen().
The core engine/shell is built around lua.
Can be compiled with luajit to get JIT compilation.
Tracing/Memory analysis doesn’t rely on ptrace() : we share the address space.
Lightweight : ~5k lines of C.
No disassembler (as of writing. Subject to change). No need for /proc support !
Function names mapped in each library is dumped from the link_map cache.
WSH : THE WICHCRAFT
INTERPRETER
Distinctive features:
-We fully share the address space with analyzed applications (no ptrace() nor context switches).
-Requires no privileges/capabilities (no root, no ptrace(), no CAP_PTRACE, no /proc…)
-No disassembly : fully portable (POSIX)
-Implements “refection” for binaries
-Full featured programming language
-Interactive and/or fully scriptable, autonomous programs
-Has no types
-Has no fxed API : any function you load in memory becomes available in WSH
-Functions have no prototypes
=> Can call arbitrary functions without knowing their prototypes => Allows for extended function annotations (to be fully automated) => Steal/Reuse any code. Add scripting to any application.
NONE OF THIS IS SUPPOSED TO WORK
WSH : THE WICHCRAFT
INTERPRETER
Advanced features:
-Loads any code via dlopen() : this solves relocations, symbols resolution, dependencies for us.
-Secondary loader bfd based (could load invalid binaries, anything in memory).
-Dumping of dynamic linker cash internals (undocumented) : linkmap
-Breakpoints without int 0x03 (use SIGINVALID + invalid opcode)
-Bruteforcing of mapped memory pages via msync() (0day, no /proc needed)
-Wsh can be compiled to do JIT compilation on the fy at runtime.
-Automated fuzzing/extended prototyping/functional testing
NONE OF THIS IS SUPPOSED TO WORK
WITCHCRAFT
DEMO
TOWARDS BINARY SELF
AWARENESS
Consciousness 1.0
SELF AWARENESS
“Consciousness is the state or quality of awareness, or, of being aware of an external object or something within oneself. It has been defned as: sentience, awareness, subjectivity, the ability to experience or to feel, wakefulness, having a sense of selfhood, and the executive control system of the mind.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness
WITCHCRAFT
Numerical solutions
WITCHCRAFT
FUTURE WORK
FUTURE WORK
-Hyde our own presence better in memory (second heap)
-Remote debugging, running process injection
-Shadow mapping, internal libraries tracing (recursive ltrace)
-ltrace/strace to valid scripts
-system call tracing
TO BE CONTINUED
Questions ?